[Koha] Help - problem with Unicode entries located but a patch is needed
Irakli Garibashvili
iraklig99 at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 13:45:55 UTC 2011
Hi!
I have been testing this problem and finally got some results, which might
be interesting/important to users from countries with non-Latin scripts:
We have Koha 3.0. with Marc21 and nozebra.
Entries made in Items fields in Georgian, Russian or even Latin characters
with diacritics (in UTF8) were corrupted at some moment :-( which was
leading to corrupted nozebra indexes and finally problems with searching.
As a result many searches on Georgian terms were unsuccessful - which
obviously is irritating - OPAC which cannot search records!
I have tested this on KOHA demo sites... all the same!
We have no experience with Zebra or KOha 3.2 yet, but I am sure the same bug
would corrupt records similarly.
So what we have found is:
when we create biblios with Unicode, everything goes fine,
when we add, modify, delete,... items with Unicode, again everything is
fine,
but all fields in Items are corrupted when we make changes in biblio!
I.e. correcting spelling in Title or Author fields do not result in any
problems with "biblios" but all fields like "callnumber", Item Note (public
or private), etc which contain non-latin characters are corrupted!
Then we examined MySQL fields and found following:
All entries in biblios and items tables are fine, while in biblioitems table
all fields except MARCXML are fine and all corrupted characters are located
in MARCXML field, in parts corresponding to 952 MARC subfields!
>From this what I guess is (as I cannot find any documentation on this
issues):
1. problems come from addbiblio.pl or some functions called from this file.
2. as all fields except MARC 952 are fine, the problems come from that
"function" which takes data from MySQL fields (obviously from Items and
Biblioitems tables) and converts it to XML record to be placed in MARCXML
field.
To proceed with this, we would appreciate any help from people who created
this module (cataloguing):
1. excellent if you could provide appropriate patch,
2. or if you could guide me where to look for a bug in the code (which files
at least).
As I say, I believe this is important to all Koha versions and users as even
demo versions have this problem.
Thanks in advance
Irakli
More information about the Koha
mailing list