[Koha] Foundation conversation

[ed c]

--- On Fri, 10/15/10, Reed Wade <reedwade at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Reed Wade <reedwade at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Koha] Foundation conversation
> To: Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> Date: Friday, October 15, 2010, 10:21 PM
> 2010/10/16 ed c <terrapin44 at yahoo.com>
> >
> > My proposal is that PTFS and HLT each would get an
> equal number (3) of slots to appoint people as they see
> first for three years. The community would also get to vote
> for slots. These "appointed" slots would decrease by one
> each year until there was no appointed slots.
> >
>
>
>
>
> How does "I bought a company that holds a DNS name the
> community used
> to care about"

If they only "used to care about" it why do people keep complaining about what Liblime puts there?

> rate any kind of additional voice or
> control?
>
> I like the "it's people -- not companies" scheme myself.

Obviously I disagree in at least some limited form. 

However if people form the anti-PTFS side are unwilling to compromise, I see only two options: 1) Two Kohas with the same name that will only more confuse people and make the issues David Lang mentioned much worse and more wide spread, or 2) The anti-PTFS people finishing the fork of the product and coming up with a new name for there version.

Edward


>
> -reed
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
>