[Koha] Proposal to form Koha Technical Committee

[Zeno Tajoli]

Hi to all,

this my answer to different questions done by Paul and about form a Koha 
Technical Committee.

> * last month, we sent a mail about moving to solR. Another sponsored
> work (thanks St Etienne). Some have answered. BUT : no decision has been
> taken. I don't mean here saying "ok, BibLibre, we will integrate your
> work without looking at how you did it", but no-one has said "OK,
> BibLibre, it's where the project want to go, your arguments are fine,
> there is only one problem with z3950 server that seems to be solvable.
> If it is solved, this streategic decision is taken". We have to go
> ahead, and now, if it's not accepted by the community, our only option
> will be to fork !

For me (and others two italian users, not here and not CILEA clients) 
the answer is:
Yes, do the solr search BUT mantains Zebra option.
Using a periodical reboot, for us, the deamon zebraque is OK
And we use only latin char.* Last week, I wrote many mails on koha-devel 
to announce all our
> underway RFCs. Maybe you can argue there's something wrong with what I
> wrote. The problem is that, once again, no-one has said anything ! So,
> what must we do next ?

For me are OK.

> * Savitra Sirohi wrote detailled RFCs in september. And they look
> awesome from a functionnal point of view. hdl asked for some schedules,
> got an answer, but I feel it's not enough. We (community) should work
> more closely with him to know sooner if/how the coding is going.
>

Now I'm working with Savitra Sirohi about the RFC "Analytic Record support"
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Analytic_Record_support

We speak on the lists and on IRC.
I update the wiki with the request of everyone.
Now we are working and there is a branch on git
And we have received a fix from Henri-Damien LAURENT

I know there is a "multi-level biblios" RFC  but I don't know
where is.

> Something like a technical commitee may fit the need. It may be
> something else. It's just that today, the situation is not sustainable !

I'm agree, the situation is not sustainable.
For me a technical committee is OK.
Or also a RM as benevolent dictator (like Linus on Linux kernel).

Bye

Zeno Tajoli


-- 
Zeno Tajoli
CILEA - Segrate (MI)
tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it
(Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci qaunto tra AT con @)