[Koha] RFC: relicense wiki.koha.org

[Ben Finney]

gsl <gsl at rhcl.org> writes:

> Excuse me for perhaps coming out of left field with this, but is GPL
> the correct technical name for GPL documentation? I'm thinking this
> might be more correct:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License

No. The FDL is not compatible with the GPL, and has many freedom
problems besides. I disagree strongly with the FSF promotion of the FDL
for works; it's needlessly restrictive and divisive.

The current Koha manual is licensed under GPL and that's good because
the manual is licensed compatibly with the programs. The wiki content
licensed under the same terms would be a good move.

-- 
 \         “What is it that makes a complete stranger dive into an icy |
  `\   river to save a solid gold baby? Maybe we'll never know.” —Jack |
_o__)                                                           Handey |
Ben Finney