[Koha] News of koha 3.0 and poll [important]
mourik jan heupink
heupink at merit.unu.edu
Fri Mar 23 01:01:52 NZST 2007
For us: I'd say we're at TWO: i've just installed 2.2.8, and life is
well, no immediate need for version 3.
I'd rather have a better and more stable version three, even if that
takes a few months.
I must say that I VERY much like the sample screen shots!!
(http://kados.org/stuff/yui_borrowers.png)
Regards,
Mourik Jan
Kyle Hall wrote:
> Personally, I'm a 2. I can't say what John or Cindy would prefer. But
> it looks like we'll be rolling out with dev_week in a matter of weeks,
> so I'd rather wait until 3.0 is more polished code-wise since we are
> no longer waiting for 3.0 before making our transition.
>
> Kyle
>
> On 3/21/07, *MJ Ray* <mjr at phonecoop.coop <mailto:mjr at phonecoop.coop>>
> wrote:
>
> This is a translation of the email of Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:25:44 +0100
> from paul POULAIN to koha-Infos. The original is at
> http://ob.paulpoulain.com/pipermail/infos/Week-of-Mon-20070319/002112.html
> <http://ob.paulpoulain.com/pipermail/infos/Week-of-Mon-20070319/002112.html>
> if you want to spot my mistranslations.
>
> *I would like to hear global-list views on the 1 / 2 / 3 survey
> below.*
>
>
> So, the message from paul POULAIN:
>
> Hello,
>
> As usual, I'm going to give you some news of Koha 3.0. *The second
> part of this email is extremely important for the users among you.*
>
> Progress
> ========
>
> * Joshua (the release manage for v3.0) and his company LibLibe have
> started tests on this version. He's found some bugs, as expected,
> but
> finds that it's in an encouraging shape.
>
> The installer has been developed by Henri-Damien as his construction
> job: once the sysadmin installation is done, the initial configuration
> (language, MARC type, catalogue tables, ...) are set through a web
> interface. It's very practical and more than that, it can be extended
> easily. We can therefore give "public library" example settings, a
> "society trust" example, that can be installed in a few clicks.
>
> The hosting platform for koha development (savannah.gnu.org
> <http://savannah.gnu.org>) had a
> very large problem at the start of the month. In summary, multiple
> disks broke simultaneously. It required three days to bring the
> platform back up. But more annoying, it's lost two days of work in
> the meantime. Everyone has had to commit their work of those two days
> anew (this concerned LibLime more than anyone in fact, but was within
> 36hours of causing me problems...) In short, a good week of loss, lots
> of energy and stress.
>
> Continuing work (and the survey)
> ===============
>
> Joshua (and it's his role as release manager) would like to improve
> three things before releasing the version:
>
> 1- fix the bugs. No-one can dispute the necessity of that.
>
> 2- Finish the code cleanup. Antoine, who worked for me for four
> months on this, didn't finish 100% of the work. That won't change
> anything much for the user, but, in the long term, it's important: it
> makes for a more stable software, easier to develop and perhaps also
> more attractive for other contributors. And then 90% of the work is
> already done, with 10% to do.
>
> 3- Revise all the templates to make something very polished. He
> proposes to use YUI (Yahoo User Interface), some components "freed" by
> Yahoo that we can therefore integrate. Graphically, that will give
> something like http://kados.org/stuff/yui_borrowers.png and
> http://kados.org/stuff/moremember.png - pretty, isn't it?
>
> There is a problem in doing all that: the time that it takes. Joshua
> doesn't know enough to estimate that for the moment and me neither.
> But I'm certain that it won't take days or weeks, but months.
>
> Now, some among you are waiting for Koha 3.0 with barely-contained
> impatience. As I've always promised to put the users first, I ask
> your opinion:
>
> 1- Argh! We must release Koha 3.0 as soon as possible. The code
> clean-up concerns you developers alone, so do it afterwards. And the
> improvement of user interface can wait too. But I need 3.0's features
> now!
>
> 2- Damn! Bad news. But good, we're working with 2.2 well enough and
> we can wait 3 months more. But not more than 3 months, even so.
>
> 3- Pah! I'm very happy with Koha 2.2. Koha 3.0 can take another 6
> months to arrive and I won't be unhappy.
>
> You can just reply 1 / 2 / 3, but you can also say more. It's
> essential that you reply, as many as possible, so I will know in which
> direction the francophone community points and so communicate it to
> Joshua (who reads us otherwise, even we must translate because he
> doesn't speak French ;-) ).
>
> I say that the argument "there's bug XXX in Koha 2.2, so I want koha
> 3.0" isn't good - if there's a bug in 2.2, we'll fix it in 2.2.x!
>
> PS: to reassure Pascale Nalon, who's done the translation to VF: this
> shouldn't impact the translation, or very marginally.
>
> Translatedly,
> --
> MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
> Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker,
> developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w.
> Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz <mailto:Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz>
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
>
>
>
>
> --
> IT Tech
> Crawford County Federated Library System
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
>
More information about the Koha
mailing list