[Koha] Migration to 2.0 betas going smoothly?

[Joshua Ferraro]

Ben,

The "Stable" (1.x) and "Unstable" (2.x) branches really represent two very different types of library cataloging.  The most notable difference is that the 2.x branch supports MARC.  If you plan to use MARC it may make better sense to try out the "Unstable" branch for now; it's pretty usable, and most of the bugs are display-related rather than funcionality issues.  An upgrade should be no problem when 2.0 is released.  Alternatively, you could set up CVS and symlink the relevent directories so that with each check-out you have the latest bug fixes.  

Joshua    

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:36:59PM -0700, Ben Ostrowsky wrote:
> If I decide not to wait until 2.0-STABLE, and install Koha 1.x now, how
> much hassle am I in for when I upgrade to 2.0?  (Assume I'm not tweaking
> the installation much, just setting up basic parameters and doing a bit of
> data entry.)
> 
> I'm willing to wait for 2.0-STABLE if it's a good idea.  Despite lurking
> on the list, I've never actually used Koha.
> 
> Ben
> 
> -- 
> Email is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some
> settling of contents may have occurred during transmission.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha