[Koha] 090 Fields
Steven F. Baljkas
baljkas at mb.sympatico.ca
Tue Sep 9 06:30:15 UTC 2003
Tuesday, September 9, 2003 01:15 CDT
Hi, Ed,
I don't think anyone could claim Koha is doing something non-standard with its usage of MARC. The decision to use the 090 in the way that it has, however, was ill-advised given (as I just told Greg) the 090 was actually used by LC itself for the call number in the past and several systems out there in the market make use of it, causing potential migration problems that then get dumped squarely on poor Koha.
# From what Chris C. and others have said since I've been on the list-serv, I gather that the H* (I won't even try to attempt the spelling at this late hour) Trust didn't care about MARC and that consequently, the developpers might not have appreciated fully how MARC-reliant much of the library world is and that there is a whole complicated history behind that.
Anyway, I like your suggestion, Ed, about moving the item type to a 9xx field. The developpers could designate one of the tags for it and then that would become a Koha feature.
# From the cataloguing side of things, this could still get screwed up in the future if one of the 9xx tags did get taken over eventually (that is not supposed to happen but ...).
I think Koha was brilliant for wanting to include more meaningful item (format) types. Kudos to whoever thought of that. There may be a more permanent and pleasing solution to the problem of moving that info to a 9xx. Hence the following modest proposal:
Perhaps for those of you who qualify as real librarians
(unlike yours truly), one might humbly suggest
something some my paraprofessional colleagues and I
have discussed over the years,
*** a prescribed localised tag for more meaningful
format types (and/or possibly other information) *** than
are prescribed by the beloved AACR2R.
Any suggestion/s would have to be submitted to CPSO
but perhaps there would be interest enough to have a
tag added.
I realise that one could do this through a note and that, yes, it is technically coded in the 007 and 008, but it would be nice to have a simpler (if sometimes redundant) and recognisable statement of the item's format for patrons (and for us, too). As with 6xx fields, an indicator could be used to denote whether the term used was from a standardised thesaurus (something that might happen one day), or purely of local use.
Just a thought, anyway.
Steven F. Baljkas
library tech at large
Koha neophyte
Winnipeg, MB CANADA
----- Original Message -----
From: COURYHOUSE at aol.com
To: shedges at skemotah.com
Cc: lambert at amigos.org ; koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Koha] 090 Fields
I guess what we have to analyze ... "is Koha doing something non standard that impacts the integrity of the MARC record? " if so perhaps the non standard
information needs to be at the end of the record past where the MARC data is kept? if there is no area present perhaps one needs to be created as a 'stash'
Just a thought....
Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC
Subj:Re: [Koha] 090 Fields
Date:9/8/2003 5:24:04 PM US Mountain Standard Time
From:shedges at skemotah.com
To:lambert at amigos.org
CC:koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
Sent from the Internet
Greg Lambert/Amigos said:
> As I was reviewing the bulkmarcimport I noticed that the 090 MARC field is
> used by Koha as the ITEMTYPE fields.
>
> In the MARC data I am importing, the 090 "a" and "b" subfields are
> assigned
> local LC call numbers.
>
> Since Koha assigns "a" as Koha Itemtype (NR)
> "b" as Koha Dewey Subclass (NR)
> "c" as Koha biblionumber (NR)
> "d" as Koha biblioitemnumber (NR)
>
> What will happen to my original 090a and 090b fields? Will they still be
> in the database? If so, will this cause item "issues"?
>
> My limited cataloging knowledge tells me that the 001 field is used for
> the
> item number information (at least in the colleges I've worked). Is that
> not the case with MARC21?
>
>
> Thanks!
> -Greg
Hmmm. Do you mean your existing MARC records use an 090 field? Koha has
to store some important non-MARC information, primarily the biblionumber,
biblioitemnumber and the itemtype, in the MARC record in order to
interface with the "old" Koha databases. The 090 tag was chosen because
neither MARC21 nor Unimarc define any use for this tag, so it was
considered to be "safe." If you have existing MARC records that have data
in an 090 tag, then you have a problem. You could move the data to a new
tag using MARC::Record.
--
Stephen Hedges
Skemotah Solutions, USA
www.skemotah.com -- shedges at skemotah.com
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list
Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Thanks Ed Sharpe, Archivist for SMECC
See the Museum's Web Site at
www.smecc.org
We are always looking for items to add to the museum's display and ref. library
please advise if you have anything we can use.
mail:
Coury House / SMECC
5802 W. Palmaire Ave.
Glendale Az 85301 USA
623-435-1522
CONFIDENZIALE: Questo messaggio e gli eventuali allegati sono confidenziali
e riservati. Se vi è stato recapitato per errore e non siete fra i
destinatari elencati, siete pregati di darne immediatamente avviso al
mittente. Le informazioni contenute non devono essere mostrate ad altri, né
utilizzate, memorizzate o copiate in qualsiasi forma.
CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may
contain reserved information. If you are not one of the named recipients,
please notify the sender immediately. Moreover, you should not disclose the
contents to any other persons, nor should the information contained be used
for any purpose or stored or copied in any form.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.katipo.co.nz/pipermail/koha/attachments/20030909/400016e4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Koha
mailing list