RDA, was: Re: Simple MARC or Simple Acquisitions?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, BWS Johnson <mhelman@illinoisalumni.org> wrote:
Salve!
Big warning: I'm not properly a cataloguer, but gosh over the years my cataloguing disguise seems to be getting very good.
The time to think about a major overhaul is *now* since the RDA proposal is on the table.
Well... I'm doubtful about the chances of RDA being a runaway hit: * it's not easily accessible (they're trying to actually sell the recommandation rather than freely distribute it) * it's not easily accessible (the mere ToC runs to 75 pages : who's going to actually read this, let alone implement it?) * it's not easily accessible (with 251 different "entities") * if you want to make it accessible, you can do "profiles" to use only subsets of those 251 entities; but wait: a recommandation with different profiles to manage... sounds a lot like Z3950 to me, and is in danger of reverting to the mess we have with UNIMARC / MARC21 / NORMARC / WHATEVERMARC * it looks a lot like marc too, with entities like "title proper", "title uniform", etc I don't know, I'm not a cataloger either : maybe RDA is the way to go, I don't claim I'm competent to pass judgment on the recommandation from a cataloguer's point of view, but I don't envision Ex Libris, SirsiDynix or, for that matter, the Koha community investing what it would take to just try to implement this thing. I'd love to be proved wrong though. Cheers, Nicolas
I'd suggest reading a paper by Martha Yee wrote for IFLA posted at http://slc.bc.ca/yee.pdf entitled PRINCIPLES FOR THE DISPLAY OF CATALOGER CREATED METADATA. I think how a system displays the MARC record is critical. As a cataloger I am shocked at the mess so many catalogs make of displaying our work to the public. I too feel it is difficult to imagine RDA getting off the ground, particularly under the current circumstances, much of which was mentioned by Nicolas Morin below. Michael Mitchell Technical Services Librarian Brazosport College Lake Jackson, TX michael.mitchell at brazosport.edu -----Original Message----- From: koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Nicolas Morin Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:49 AM To: BWS Johnson Cc: Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Subject: [Koha] RDA, was: Re: Simple MARC or Simple Acquisitions? On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, BWS Johnson <mhelman@illinoisalumni.org> wrote:
Salve!
Big warning: I'm not properly a cataloguer, but gosh over the years my cataloguing disguise seems to be getting very good.
The time to think about a major overhaul is *now* since the RDA
proposal is
on the table.
Well... I'm doubtful about the chances of RDA being a runaway hit: * it's not easily accessible (they're trying to actually sell the recommandation rather than freely distribute it) * it's not easily accessible (the mere ToC runs to 75 pages : who's going to actually read this, let alone implement it?) * it's not easily accessible (with 251 different "entities") * if you want to make it accessible, you can do "profiles" to use only subsets of those 251 entities; but wait: a recommandation with different profiles to manage... sounds a lot like Z3950 to me, and is in danger of reverting to the mess we have with UNIMARC / MARC21 / NORMARC / WHATEVERMARC * it looks a lot like marc too, with entities like "title proper", "title uniform", etc I don't know, I'm not a cataloger either : maybe RDA is the way to go, I don't claim I'm competent to pass judgment on the recommandation from a cataloguer's point of view, but I don't envision Ex Libris, SirsiDynix or, for that matter, the Koha community investing what it would take to just try to implement this thing. I'd love to be proved wrong though. Cheers, Nicolas _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
participants (2)
-
Mitchell, Michael -
Nicolas Morin