Sonali Modi wrote:

Does koha 3.0 support or compilable with WCAG 2.0 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). [...]

It should be easier to comply with WCAG 2.0 than 1.0 because WCAG 2.0 doesn't actually say much about accessibility (my opinion only) and allows use of Javascript and random junk. Whether the OPAC complies or not probably depends a lot on what templates are being used, but it shouldn't be too hard to get the compliance, if someone is willing to do or pay for the work. I don't think it was a 3.0 release goal, but the release manager or maintainer might correct me on that in a mo. The librarian interface almost certainly isn't because searching http://bugs.koha.org/ for "valid html" suggests we've quite a few to fix before we meet that prerequisite. So, to summarise: I think the OPAC is close but probably not quite. If someone did a proper analysis/report, that would be a big help! Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster and LMS developer at | software www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op