Hello, I am reading some advice on how to prepare the catalog for RDA records, and it suggests that I map the MARC fields 338 and 336 to display as 245, subfield h. I have modified MARC frameworks in the past but don't know how I would make one field display as another in the OPAC. Is there a way to do this? Thank you. Karen Kohn Collection Development Manager Education and Sociology Librarian Landman Library Arcadia University 450 S. Easton Road Glenside, PA 19038 ph: 215-572-8528 fax: 215-572-0240
Kohn, Karen wrote:
I am reading some advice on how to prepare the catalog for RDA records, and it suggests that I map the MARC fields 338 and 336 to display as 245, subfield h. I have modified MARC frameworks in the past but don't know how I would make one field display as another in the OPAC. Is there a way to do this?
You could make one field look like part of another in the OPAC if you're using XSLT views by editing the XSL files in the templates koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/prog/LANGUAGE-CODE-HERE/xslt/ I suspect you can do it with isbd views but I have not checked. What advice are you reading that suggests that? Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha
For an overview of the changes from AACR2 to RDA, see the SLC's Cheat Sheet at: http://www.slc.bc.ca/cheats/aacr22rda.htm If RDA is adopted, the ISBD 245$h will be discontinued, and they are replacing them with the 336-338 fields. Of course, this is controversial, and many want to continue following ISBD rules, which after all, are long-established and international in scope. Looking at the 336-338 fields in the Cheat Sheet shows that they are not very "human-friendly" since they use strange terminology, e.g. "mediated" "unmediated", and many believe (including me) that while generating the ISBD format 245$h is OK, more important is generating different icons, since this will be more meaningful to people. And just as simple to do! James Weinheimer j.weinheimer@aur.edu Director of Library and Information Services The American University of Rome via Pietro Roselli, 4 00153 Rome, Italy voice- 011 39 06 58330919 ext. 258 fax-011 39 06 58330992 First Thus: http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/ Cooperative Cataloging Rules: http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/ -----Original Message----- From: koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of MJ Ray Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:15 AM To: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Subject: Re: [Koha] MARC for RDA Kohn, Karen wrote:
I am reading some advice on how to prepare the catalog for RDA records, and it suggests that I map the MARC fields 338 and 336 to display as 245, subfield h. I have modified MARC frameworks in the past but don't know how I would make one field display as another in the OPAC. Is there a way to do this?
You could make one field look like part of another in the OPAC if you're using XSLT views by editing the XSL files in the templates koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/prog/LANGUAGE-CODE-HERE/xslt/ I suspect you can do it with isbd views but I have not checked. What advice are you reading that suggests that? Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
participants (3)
-
Kohn, Karen -
MJ Ray -
Weinheimer Jim