Dear Friends, I just installed Koha latest version 3.02.02. I found a strange "?" symbol in cataloging data entry sheet. Thisquestion mark symbol appear adjacent to MARC field number. Please see the screen shot here. http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/L-GV2yH4VrEMSG3OcxBl8w?feat=directlink Another problem is that, field 100 Author seems locked. I changed the parameters in System Preferences > Authorities > Biblio Addauthorities But it still seems locked. I would like to hear a solution from you, Regards, -- Vimal Kumar V. Mahatma Gandhi University Library Kottayam, Kerala- 686 560 Web: http://www.vimalkumar.co.nr Blog: http://vimalkumar.oksociety.in --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I forget what I was taught. I only remember what I have learnt" -Patrick White
I found a strange "?" symbol in cataloging data entry sheet. This question mark symbol appear adjacent to MARC field number.
Clicking the "?" will open MARC documentation for that tag. Unfortunately the way this link is implemented you're not getting the right cursor for a link. We'll have to change that.
Another problem is that, field 100 Author seems locked.
Check the subfield structure for that MARC framework. You probably have 100 linked to an authority. For example: /cgi-bin/koha/admin/marc_subfields_structure.pl?op=add_form&tagfield=100&frameworkcode=BKS#morea Under tab "a," click "display more constraints." Under "Other options" look for "Thesaurus." Set this to a blank value to unlink 100a from authorities. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org
In my opinion, the very good idea of the link to the documentation could be added to the tag number itself, without adding the '?'. And maybe could be present/absent depending on a syspref. sb On Dec 22, 2010, at 16:03 , Owen Leonard wrote:
Clicking the "?" will open MARC documentation for that tag.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Stefano Bargioni <bargioni@pusc.it> wrote:
In my opinion, the very good idea of the link to the documentation could be added to the tag number itself, without adding the '?'. And maybe could be present/absent depending on a syspref.
That's the way my original patch implemented it (both ideas). Perhaps we can restore at least the syspref-managed visibility. About the '?' symbol, It was pointed out that it was a bit hidden when using the field nomber as link in the dev list. To+
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Stefano Bargioni <bargioni@pusc.it> wrote:
In my opinion, the very good idea of the link to the documentation could be added to the tag number itself, without adding the '?'. And maybe could be present/absent depending on a syspref.
That's the way my original patch implemented it (both ideas). Perhaps we can restore at least the syspref-managed visibility. About the '?' symbol, It was pointed out that it was a bit hidden when using the field nomber as link in the dev list.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5546 To+
participants (4)
-
Owen Leonard -
Stefano Bargioni -
Tomas Cohen Arazi -
Vimal Kumar