I think you are confusing the issues ed. Complaining about bad behaviour is not the same as caring enough about a domain the project no longers uses, to allow for a stacked foundation. As for the fork, you have it wrong too, there are most definitely some forks, Koha is not one of them. I don't see why we should have to rename, how about we just keep using koha-community.org and working on Koha. Ill make you a deal, i won't mention koha.org again if that will assuage your worry that I want it back enough to rush in a foundation with special treatment for one company. Chris On 16 Oct 2010 17:25, "ed c" <terrapin44@yahoo.com> wrote: --- On Fri, 10/15/10, Reed Wade <reedwade@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Reed Wade <reedwade@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: [Koha] Foundation conversation To: Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Date: Friday, October 15, 2010, 10:21 PM

2010/10/16 ed c <terrapin44@yahoo.com>

...

My proposal is that PTFS and HLT each would get an

... If they only "used to care about" it why do people keep complaining about what Liblime puts there?

rate any kind of additional voice or control?

I like the "it's people -- not companies" sch... Obviously I disagree in at least some limited form.

However if people form the anti-PTFS side are unwilling to compromise, I see only two options: 1) Two Kohas with the same name that will only more confuse people and make the issues David Lang mentioned much worse and more wide spread, or 2) The anti-PTFS people finishing the fork of the product and coming up with a new name for there version. Edward

-reed _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-commu...