Re: [Koha] Spam from BestBookBuddies (OpenLX)
Greetings all, I personally agree that work needs to be done on this list. Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that. If you want to get listed in the Koha Yellow Pages, pony up some time on bug testing, dev submittals etc.. Invest in the community and you can put your company on the community site. We can even put up a disclaimer stating that there are many more companies out there, these are just the ones that give back in a significant way… This will encourage participation and reward those who already participate (which includes the vast majority of those already on the list). In my humble opinion, giving Koha services away for free in order to get a foot in the door to sell your primary offering (such as books) does not count as a contribution to the community. In fact, if the system is not properly supported because it is used as a peripheral marketing technique, it could end up hurting the community, as poor support translates into poor software in the eyes of the users. Not saying this is the case here, just some hypothetical contemplation :)
Nathan A. Curulla Owner, CRO ByWater Solutions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:21:44 +1000 From: Bob Birchall <bob@calyx.net.au> To: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Subject: Re: [Koha] Spam from BestBookBuddies (OpenLX) Message-ID: <835ba28d-0b9e-cba3-c6e4-15285e78a6c0@calyx.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
There we go again - 'official list' as if it has some status other than as a yellow pages directory. I suspect the noise from the sub-continent particularly will increase, whilst very little comes back to the project. I think we should just get rid of that page from the website. My 2 cents, Bob Birchall Calyx
*************************************
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
I think that's an interesting idea, but the larger problem remains: There will always be contention around how the support companies list is made, no matter what. I think we've done pretty well with the very basic requirements we've set for for listing. I'm inclined to either stick with it or, if it's agreed that the current system is too contentious, eliminate it altogether. The immediate question, about a listing for BestBookBuddies, is best answered as it already was: It would be a duplicate listing of OpenLX and should be rejected. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org
Greetings, Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s). Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already. GPML, Mark Tompsett
Just to cross the topics, we already had this discussion earlier: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2015-July/043138.html "Proposal to remove the 'Paid support' list" On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 12:17 Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Kia ora! I still hold the firm opinion that deleting the list is a cop out. The listing is one of the best ways that new Libraries find support if they are reluctant to do things themselves. Folks might want to think about linking Hea to this page so that people that are considering Koha can find like minded institutions nearby. It would be awesome if there were some way for existing libraries to signal that they are open to providing feedback about vendors. The suggested name change might help, and I would support that. I would also support removing any spammers. I feel strongly that Liz improved on the old list substantially. It is very easy for companies that are now happily established to want to scrap this list. That action punishes startups and the optics are trash. Pulling the ladder up after yourself is not attractive. Cheers,Brooke
* BWS Johnson (abesottedphoenix@yahoo.com) wrote:
Kia ora! I still hold the firm opinion that deleting the list is a cop out. The listing is one of the best ways that new Libraries find support if they are reluctant to do things themselves. Folks might want to think about linking Hea to this page so that people that are considering Koha can find like minded institutions nearby. It would be awesome if there were some way for existing libraries to signal that they are open to providing feedback about vendors.
I think in that case, someone else could volunteer (yourself perhaps) to take this 'cop out' off the people who currently have to deal with the multiple offlist emails about it. And maintain the list, maybe on the wiki where it can be done by anyone.
The suggested name change might help, and I would support that. I would also support removing any spammers. I feel strongly that Liz improved on the old list substantially.
It is very easy for companies that are now happily established to want to scrap this list. That action punishes startups and the optics are trash. Pulling the ladder up after yourself is not attractive.
I find this remark quite offensive. Just FYI. In case you didn't intend it to be. Chris
Cheers,Brooke _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist. Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to die from list. With Regards, Vinod Kumar Mishra, Assistant Librarian, Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), NIT Rourkela, Sundergadh-769008, Odisha, India. Mob:91+9439420860 Website: http://mishravk.com/ ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874 *"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma Gandhi* On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Vinod: Koha like most successful FOSS projects, work on a "honour" system where everyone is expected to do the right thing. We do have a "code-of-conduct" but that is mostly about diversity and other issues. Further, everyone who maintains the website do so as volunteers. Expecting them to start acting as police is probably not the best of ideas. I know for a fact that Liz stopped volunteering on the PAID provider section maintenance as she was sick of dealing with it. The "X" no. of patch criteria does not solve anything IMHO for several reasons. Patches are not linear entities. Often they get to be completed only with active contribution of others. Most often, the patches are credited to individuals and not the companies they represent. So what happens when an employee dev leave and say joins another Koha service provider? Who will get the credits? It may sound easy, but its not so legally. Then how does a patch say one that permanently addresses the auto-increment issue compare against 5 trivial string patch? Basically, do we become bureaucrats OR do we write Koha? Just my 2c -Indranil On Aug 10, 2017 3:45 PM, "vinod mishra" <mishravk79@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist.
Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to die from list.
With Regards,
Vinod Kumar Mishra, Assistant Librarian, Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), NIT Rourkela, Sundergadh-769008, Odisha, India. Mob:91+9439420860 Website: http://mishravk.com/ ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874
*"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma Gandhi*
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Further, everyone who maintains the website do so as volunteers. Expecting
Salvete! Mashing some stuff up here, but I feel like we need a vote on this either over the listserv or at the next IRC General Sep 6. them to start acting as police is probably not the best of ideas. I know for a fact that Liz stopped volunteering on the PAID provider section maintenance as she was sick of dealing with it.
I'm happy to serve as the gatekeeper for this page for a year. I'm not for a patch wall. Carrots, not sticks.
Basically, do we become bureaucrats OR do we write Koha?
It doesn't have to be an either or decision. You choose to write code, which is great. When developers think "Oh yuck, I can be coding instead" Librarians should step up. Cheers, Brooke
Hi, On Aug 10, 2017 5:47 PM, "BWS Johnson" <abesottedphoenix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mashing some stuff up here, but I feel like we need a vote on this
either over the listserv or at the next IRC General Sep 6. +1
I'm not for a patch wall. Carrots, not sticks.
I'm afraid the metaphor "patch wall" escapes me. Can you pls elaborate?
Basically, do we become bureaucrats OR do we write Koha?
It doesn't have to be an either or decision. You choose to write code, which is great. When developers think "Oh yuck, I can be coding instead" Librarians should step up.
Not to nitpick, but I used "write" as a metaphor for all activities around Koha, given that the written word is our primary tool - whether to answer user queries, write a blog about a cool new feature, improve the wiki and manual, discuss and decide new spec (e.g. the MARC framework debate we are having on the devel list that needs inputs and approval from librarians even more than from the devs) and finally of course there's writing the code. A dev who simply says "Yuck! I could be coding instead" is IMHO a poor one who has basically stopped listening to the users and the eco-system they are in. Cheers Indranil
Cheers, Brooke
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:13:20 +0000 (UTC) BWS Johnson <abesottedphoenix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mashing some stuff up here, but I feel like we need a vote on this either over the listserv or at the next IRC General Sep 6.
I thought the next IRC general was Sep 9. Has it moved or have I been drunk-diarying again? Also, this discussion seems misplaced under the "Spam from BestBookBuddies..." - compose new threads for subject changes, please. Thanks -- MJR
Hi
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist.
This means everything else except writing patches is not considered as "help". Best wishes: Michael -- Geschäftsführer · Diplombibliothekar BBS, Informatiker eidg. Fachausweis Admin Kuhn GmbH · Pappelstrasse 20 · 4123 Allschwil · Schweiz T 0041 (0)61 261 55 61 · E mik@adminkuhn.ch · W www.adminkuhn.ch
For the longest time, I resisted getting listed on the PAID support providers list because of personal reasons. But then I started running up against RFPs that made listing there a mandatory qualification point for placing a bid. Now that my outfit is there for quite some time, I can honestly tell that not a *single* piece of work has landed from being listed there. Sure there has been a few enquiries but that's the extent of if. The time when Koha needed the visibility of local support has largely passed, at least in India where Koha has emerged as the defacto choice. On the other hand, Indian service providers on that list make up ~25% (or more) of the global listing in number, yet the number of contributions, including patches have probably been the least. Most are not even active in the community. So I do not consider deletion of the page to do anyone any major disservice, since we can't do anything about false claims - yes, several of the Indian providers listed make tall claims of community contribution and show the listing as being the proof. Surprise!!! No one reads the disclaimers! :D cheers indranil -- Indranil Das Gupta L2C2 Technologies Phone : +91-98300-20971 WWW : http://www.l2c2.co.in Blog : http://blog.l2c2.co.in IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg
Vinod, This already exists and is auto-generated for each release. For 17.05, https://koha-community.org/koha-17-05-released But, as said previously by others, 1 != 1 and there are much more than just writing patches in a community daily tasks. Regards, Jonathan On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 at 07:15 vinod mishra <mishravk79@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist.
Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to die from list.
With Regards,
Vinod Kumar Mishra, Assistant Librarian, Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), NIT Rourkela, Sundergadh-769008, Odisha, India. Mob:91+9439420860 Website: http://mishravk.com/ ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874
*"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma Gandhi*
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Hi All A proposal, for voting on. 1/ make the listing criteria more stringent + move the list off the main site to its own thing. Or we just make it more official and increase all the problems. So move it off the site and make it 'the community managed list'. Or some other name. But make it its own thing clearly maintained by volunteers, not part of the main site and in no way official at all. Chris On 11 August 2017 3:26:44 AM NZST, Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> wrote:
Vinod,
This already exists and is auto-generated for each release. For 17.05, https://koha-community.org/koha-17-05-released But, as said previously by others, 1 != 1 and there are much more than just writing patches in a community daily tasks.
Regards, Jonathan
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 at 07:15 vinod mishra <mishravk79@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist.
Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to die from list.
With Regards,
Vinod Kumar Mishra, Assistant Librarian, Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), NIT Rourkela, Sundergadh-769008, Odisha, India. Mob:91+9439420860 Website: http://mishravk.com/ ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874
*"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma Gandhi*
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I mostly just read this list but I thought I'd comment on this subject. I think this should be put to a vote. I think Chris has spelled out three good categories. It might be that there are one or two more categories. Just add those suggestions in the next day or two and then put out a poll. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:34 PM Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
Hi All
A proposal, for voting on. 1/ make the listing criteria more stringent + move the list off the main site to its own thing.
Or we just make it more official and increase all the problems.
So move it off the site and make it 'the community managed list'. Or some other name. But make it its own thing clearly maintained by volunteers, not part of the main site and in no way official at all.
Chris
On 11 August 2017 3:26:44 AM NZST, Jonathan Druart < jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> wrote:
Vinod,
This already exists and is auto-generated for each release. For 17.05, https://koha-community.org/koha-17-05-released But, as said previously by others, 1 != 1 and there are much more than just writing patches in a community daily tasks.
Regards, Jonathan
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 at 07:15 vinod mishra <mishravk79@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we can make a parameter like the company who have submitted at least five patch/new code for major active release oldoldstable, oldstable and stable will be only listed. For example if a company has five code/patch in 16.5 than he may be listed continuously up-to 17.5 once 17.11 will release and there is no contribution in 16.11 than they may be delist.
Above is only one parameter but someone have to monitor this continuously to update the list, however range of version can be increased, by doing so they will be encouraged to contribute continuously if they do not want to die from list.
With Regards,
Vinod Kumar Mishra, Assistant Librarian, Biju Patnaik Central Library (BPCL), NIT Rourkela, Sundergadh-769008, Odisha, India. Mob:91+9439420860 Website: http://mishravk.com/ ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7874
*"Spiritual relationship is far more precious than physical. Physical relationship divorced from spiritual is body without soul" -- Mahatma Gandhi*
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
Nathan A. Curulla suggested:
Maybe we should change the listing to “contributing support companies” or something like that.
While I think that is a good idea, and then companies without community participation get removed, the problem still remains: people don't read. We've put a nice disclaimer that this is not an official list and has no official seal of approval meaning to the list, and yet people still use it that way. It is impossible to educate people who refuse to read, even though the preamble write up is a rather good explanation of how to look for a Koha support provider. As such, the only reasonable course of action is to delete the list, otherwise it will continue to be used that way, no matter what we put on the page(s).
Owen Leonard wrote:
It would be a duplicate listing ... and should be rejected.
Who determines it is a duplicate listing? Because last time I looked some other entries looked like duplicates to me, much like OpenLX/BBB. And cleaning up duplicates is a pain. Yet another reason to just delete the list already.
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- *Diedre Conkling* *Lincoln County Library DistrictP.O. Box 2027Newport, OR 97365Phone & Fax: 541-265-3066Work email**: **diedre@lincolncolibrarydist.org* <diedre@lincolncolibrarydist.org> *Home email: **diedre08@gmail.com* <diedre08@gmail.com> “If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude.”―Maya Angelou
Hi On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
So move it off the site and make it 'the community managed list'. Or some other name. But make it its own thing clearly maintained by volunteers, not part of the main site and in no way official at all.
Anything on *.koha-community.org will be deemed "official" ;-) indranil
* Indranil Das Gupta (indradg@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
So move it off the site and make it 'the community managed list'. Or some other name. But make it its own thing clearly maintained by volunteers, not part of the main site and in no way official at all.
Anything on *.koha-community.org will be deemed "official" ;-)
Yep, right off that url is what I meant. Because I see the list as something that works against small companies, rather than for them. As your experience would attest Indranil. Not being on the list is used as a weapon against companies. So pretty much the exact opposite viewpoint to Brooke. I see the list as just one more obstacle in a dev/vendor being able to offer Koha support, rather than a help. Especially if as we are talking about is making it harder to get listed. This will be my last email on it, and I will be talking to my colleagues about having our name removed, and I hope the whole list and all the problems it causes for new developers goes away. Chris
indranil
-- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
I do agree . On Aug 11, 2017 1:56 AM, "Chris Cormack" <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
* Indranil Das Gupta (indradg@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
So move it off the site and make it 'the community managed list'. Or some
other name. But make it its own thing clearly maintained by volunteers, not part of the main site and in no way official at all.
Anything on *.koha-community.org will be deemed "official" ;-)
Yep, right off that url is what I meant.
Because I see the list as something that works against small companies, rather than for them. As your experience would attest Indranil. Not being on the list is used as a weapon against companies. So pretty much the exact opposite viewpoint to Brooke.
I see the list as just one more obstacle in a dev/vendor being able to offer Koha support, rather than a help. Especially if as we are talking about is making it harder to get listed. This will be my last email on it, and I will be talking to my colleagues about having our name removed, and I hope the whole list and all the problems it causes for new developers goes away.
Chris
indranil
-- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
participants (12)
-
BWS Johnson -
Chris Cormack -
Diedre Conkling -
Indranil Das Gupta -
Jonathan Druart -
Mark Tompsett -
Michael Kuhn -
MJ Ray -
Nathan Curulla -
Owen Leonard -
vikram zadgaonkar -
vinod mishra