In a Koha item record, should the 999$c (BIBLIONUMBER) and 999$d (BIBLIOITEMNUMBER) fields always be identical? We've had some issue show up with the newest LLEK testing where the 999$c and 999$d fields don't match in some records and it causes a situation where users may see a summary record for one item, but clicking on the title link leads to an entirely different item. Why there are even two different fields for biblionumber and biblioitemnumber if the field data is always supposed to be identical for those fields? -- Stacy Pober Information Alchemist Manhattan College Library Riverdale, NY 10471 stacy.pober@manhattan.edu
Hi Stacy, On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Stacy Pober wrote:
In a Koha item record, should the 999$c (BIBLIONUMBER) and 999$d (BIBLIOITEMNUMBER) fields always be identical?
There's no guarantee that they will be identical.
Why there are even two different fields for biblionumber and biblioitemnumber if the field data is always supposed to be identical for those fields?
Historical reasons - in earlier versions of Koha, it used to be possible for there to be more than one biblioitem record for each biblio record, representing a sort of call number record. That changed by Koha 3.0, but along the way some code slipped in that assumed that the biblionumber would always be the same as the biblioitemnumber. Most of that has been removed by now; there shouldn't be all that many spots in the code left to be corrected. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Data Services Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source email: gmc@esilibrary.com direct: +1 352-215-7548 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/
participants (2)
-
Galen Charlton -
Stacy Pober