Hello all. Koha v. 3.00.00.107 Zebra 2.0.34 We're having a problem with ghost records in the index. The Zebra index is rebuilt every night, but still when searching, I'll pull up two records: one that has been deleted and one that is real. The public receives a 404 error. I receive Can't call method "fields" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/catalogue/MARCdetail.pl line 123. Has anyone solved this problem? Will upgrading solve the problem or just compound? Thanx. Lenora StreamNet Regional Librarian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
* Lenora Oftedahl (OFTL@critfc.org) wrote:
Hello all.
Koha v. 3.00.00.107 Zebra 2.0.34
We're having a problem with ghost records in the index. The Zebra index is rebuilt every night, but still when searching, I'll pull up two records: one that has been deleted and one that is real. The public receives a 404 error. I receive
Can't call method "fields" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/catalogue/MARCdetail.pl line 123.
Has anyone solved this problem? Will upgrading solve the problem or just compound?
Hi Lenora You could try http://koha-community.org/documentation/faq/searching/#5 Chris
Thanx. Lenora StreamNet Regional Librarian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Lenora Oftedahl <OFTL@critfc.org> wrote:
Hello all.
Koha v. 3.00.00.107 Zebra 2.0.34
We're having a problem with ghost records in the index. The Zebra index is rebuilt every night, but still when searching, I'll pull up two records: one that has been deleted and one that is real. The public receives a 404 error. I receive
Can't call method "fields" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/catalogue/MARCdetail.pl line 123.
Has anyone solved this problem? Will upgrading solve the problem or just compound?
Perhaps you're missing the '-r' switch for rebuild_zebra.pl to zero the indexed records before reindexing. That could lead to duplicated records, and some deleted records to still appear in search results and hence the (fixed in master :-D) 404 error for asking for inexistent record retreival when you click on them. Regards To+
Hello Lenora, We had the same problem. You could verify your .../biblio/record.abs file and be sure that you index only one field, containing the biblionumber in the "local-number" index (the biblionumber is stored in 001 in our configuration). Our problem was : melm 001 local-number,local-number:n ...... melm 035$a local-number,local-number:n We had two fields indexed in "local-number" and we had "ghost entries". We have corrected in : melm 001 local-number,local-number:n ...... melm 035$a identifier-other,identifier-other:n Reindex and it was the end of the fabulous story of ghost entries. I hope this will help you. Regards Bernard Lenora Oftedahl a écrit :
Hello all.
Koha v. 3.00.00.107 Zebra 2.0.34
We're having a problem with ghost records in the index. The Zebra index is rebuilt every night, but still when searching, I'll pull up two records: one that has been deleted and one that is real. The public receives a 404 error. I receive
Can't call method "fields" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/catalogue/MARCdetail.pl line 123.
Has anyone solved this problem? Will upgrading solve the problem or just compound?
Thanx. Lenora StreamNet Regional Librarian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Bernard Desnoues Bibliothécaire Bibliothèque universitaire des langues et civilisations Pôle informatique 60, rue de Wattignies - 75012 Paris Tél. (+33) 01 53 46 15 57 Fax. (+33) 01 53 46 15 90 http://www.bulac.fr bernard.desnoues@bulac.fr
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Bernard Desnoues <bernard.desnoues@bulac.fr> wrote:
Hello Lenora,
We had the same problem. You could verify your .../biblio/record.abs file and be sure that you index only one field, containing the biblionumber in the "local-number" index (the biblionumber is stored in 001 in our configuration). Our problem was : melm 001 local-number,local-number:n ...... melm 035$a local-number,local-number:n We had two fields indexed in "local-number" and we had "ghost entries". We have corrected in : melm 001 local-number,local-number:n ...... melm 035$a identifier-other,identifier-other:n Reindex and it was the end of the fabulous story of ghost entries.
Perhaps its just out of my knowledge's scope, by I don't see the problem of having two different fields indexed under the same name, I mean, I'd think both would match the same record and thus not be shown twice. I'd rather think of a weird coincidence. I'm sorry if my confusion just makes the situation more obscure. To+
participants (4)
-
Bernard Desnoues -
Chris Cormack -
Lenora Oftedahl -
Tomas Cohen Arazi