Le 23/12/2010 07:34, Chris Cormack a écrit :

I haven't yet, I was wondering if you had a patch for it working at itemlevel, if not ill do one uncommenting it again.

Chris

Well anything you would do to solve this would be quite disappointing. So uncommenting would be ok for us. To give more details. Either you would loose correct count of hits and performance on result display using a while loop and getting the next result while you donot have 20 results... ... But would be also a pain to paginate. Or you would loose the accuracy making at biblio level what should be at item level. So we worked on that. Hard. But never got a satisfying solution. The solution nehuel came up with was to hide the unavailable items and biblios of current page. And then it would show 3 biblios if you had only 3 biblios with items available... At least as far as I can remember... Maybe he implemented the while solution... Having a stylesheet to grey out those unavailable items/biblios would be better and quicker. Availability is a slippy notion. Could mean checkout-able (availability to loan) or on-shelf... Most users think it is onshelf... But... Could be reserved... withrdrawn... We are building a plugin for solr to index and calculate availablility of a record. This will be a much solid solution I think. My 2 cents. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT

...

On 23 Dec 2010 19:32, "LAURENT Henri-Damien" <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com <mailto:henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com>> wrote:

Le 23/12/2010 07:26, Chris Cormack a écrit :

...

Hi Henri Damien

Its actually because the availability check is commented out in the code. M...

Oh yes... Well it works the way it worked.... that is : availability at biblio level and not at item level. But at least it doesnot fail. Yes. I guess I should post a follow or maybe you did ? -- Henri-Damien LAURENT