<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">It
seems, from reading comments so far, that some are in favor of a foundation and
some are not. Many ideas have been shared to the listserv and our initial
proposal remains on the wiki. <br></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>That seems an accurate assessment. For those of us who were not privy to the foundation-forming discussion of last year, I think it would be helpful if the reasons for establishing a new foundation could be set forth. I read over the wiki, and it seems to talk more about how the foundation should be set up, and less about why. In fact, the comparison chart (<a href="http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Comparison_chart_of_associations_and_foundations" target="_blank">http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Comparison_chart_of_associations_and_foundations</a> ) doesn't even express clearly the pros of the new foundation approach (either of them). I think, for me at least, this discussion would be more coherent if I knew why it was being repeated.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Jared Camins-Esakov</div><br>-- <br>Jared Camins-Esakov<div>Freelance bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC</div>
<div>(phone) +1 (917) 727-3445</div><div>(e-mail) <a href="mailto:jcamins@cpbibliography.com" target="_blank">jcamins@cpbibliography.com</a></div><div>(web) <a href="http://www.cpbibliography.com/" target="_blank">http://www.cpbibliography.com/</a></div>
<br>