<html>
<body>
<font size=3>Personally, I recommend that my libraries use the
"default" framework, especially when using the z39.50
searching.<br><br>
That way, all the richness of the searchable fields are used.<br><br>
If we load a record using Z39.50 into another, smaller framework we may
lose some access points that will be helpful later on.<br><br>
Kathy<br><br>
At 11:22 AM 11/30/2009, Elaine Bradtke wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">3) There seem to be quite a
profusion of MARC frameworks. While I<br>
understand it will be useful when we bring in our data on Serials,
and<br>
possibly the audio and video collections, I'm wondering what the
point<br>
is for all the rest of the stuff. I've had to do some tweaking to
the<br>
MARC framework to accommodate some of the complexities of our<br>
collection. So far I've done this in the Books, Booklets,
Workbooks<br>
framework. But the import seems to go into the Default
framework.<br>
Should I be making all my tweaks in the Default framework and not<br>
worry about the others for now? The items we're currently attempting<br>
to import are (mostly) some form of printed
material.</font></blockquote></body>
<br>
<body>
<font face="Garamond" size=4>Kathleen D. Rippel<br>
Dept. Head/Consultant--Resource Sharing and Access ; <br>
Pathfinder Central (Manager)<br>
Central Kansas Library System<br>
1409 Williams<br>
Great Bend, KS 67530<br><br>
(620-792-4865) phone<br>
(800-362-2642) toll-free, KS<br>
(620-792-5495) fax<br><br>
kdr@ckls.org<br>
</font><font size=3>
********************************************************************************************<br>
</font><font face="Garamond" size=4>I'm currently reading: The Time
Traveler's Wife, by Audrey Niffenegger.<br>
I'm currently listening to: Angels & Demons, by Dan
Brown.</font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>