<HTML>
<BODY>
Salvete!<br>
<br>
>2- Damn! Bad news. But good, we're working with 2.2 well enough and<br>
>we can wait 3 months more. But not more than 3 months, even so.<br>
<br>
"Barely contained impatience" has it, I'm afraid :) In reality, my answer is probably between 2 and 3. I must refer to the doctrine of "I ain't payin', so I ain't expectin' much." I must also restate "Vive La France!" It wouldn't be right to demand more of you all. <br>
Simultaneously, you've spoilt me rotten over the last few years, so my expectations are very high for upgrade times. I covet the LibLime demo and the Athensville catalogue; they're very smooth and pretty and the catalogue seems to address a bit of the 650 problem rather nicely. <br>
While I don't want to press for a premature release, particularly if that meant that bugs went unaddressed I would really, really like to see 3.0 or something very close to it hit the streets. There is a LOT of excitement about Koha right now, and I think we'd be better able to capitalise on it should we have a precise release date. I've also been holding back on writing documentation in anticipation of the next product. The installer stuff sounds great. Would that we could have an Ubuntu package. (Yes, I know why we don't. It doesn't stop me from wanting that. Click, click, done. The Library ILS market would move to OS overnight >:)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Brooke @ Hinsdale MA
</BODY></HTML>