<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Christopher Hicks wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0306181722330.22184-100000@yakko.chicks.net">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:COURYHOUSE@aol.com">COURYHOUSE@aol.com</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">OK so it is still not going to be useable by our community for a while then.
Ultra bummer. now I have 30 sad news emails to send out.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->It doesn't have to be sad news emails! It's just a matter of timing.
You can play with 2.0 koha while waiting for 2.0.1 to get familiar with
Koha and discover any other issues you may need fixed. By the time 2.0.1
comes out you'll be ready to consider a beta schedule and projected
production date. Plus actively testing 2.0 until the next minor release
comes will almost certainly help 2.0.1 arrive sooner. What sadness?
</pre>
</blockquote>
** 1 **<br>
100% agree with christopher.<br>
Note also that we speak of 2.0.1, not of 2.2 !<br>
<br>
I remind :<br>
2.0.x => improvments<br>
2.2 => new features<br>
LC not being a new feature imho.<br>
<br>
** 2 **<br>
What's not nice with Libre software is that you may sometimes have to
wait for a feature.<br>
What's nice with Libre software is that if you don't want to wait you
can do it yourself or fund it (if you want to fund this feature, feel
free to ask. I'm sure I won't be the only volunteer...)<br>
<br>
PS : some ppl in France says that "Libre software" is often used in
english countries to avoid the "free" mistake (like free speach, not
free beer). Is it true ?<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Paul POULAIN
Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres
responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.koha-fr.org">http://www.koha-fr.org</a>)
</pre>
</body>
</html>