Wed Nov 11 03:01:06 NZDT 2009
see would be to name based on treating "community supported Koha" as the
original, and the PTFS versions as forks.
While I understand the situation is slightly more complicated than that,
it seems like a good approximation. A fork indicates some difference
from the original without making any implications as to superiority
either way. Calling original Community, on the other hand, does imply
inferiority for me due to its use in other projects, as pointed out by Reed.
"Community supported Koha" could be referred to as simply "Koha" for the
general public, tacking on something like "Standard" or "Trunk" as
appropriate for the audience when necessary to make the distinction
clear, and the PTFS/LibLime versions as "PTFS Enterprise/Harley Koha".
My two cents.
More information about the Koha